Best practices for ...
 
Share:

We have updated the forum software 🙂 ! We are now working on upgrading the whole site and the Forum to a dark theme...  so please refresh your internet browser twice to properly update the forum appearance AND functionality... Check your internet browser for the refresh function, on windows, this usually is the F5 button, but it depends on your internet browser.

Best practices for additional post-processing  

  RSS

(@brcooley)
Molecular Cloud Customer
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 4
March 4, 2019 21:43  

Hello fellow APP users,

With APP not yet including a full set of image processing tools, I wanted to understand what best practices folks may have for performing things like noise reduction and deconvolution in other tools which provide them.

Some of these sort of operations are best performed on linear data, so starting with an export of an unstretched image from APP is probably a good starting point. However, outside of something like Pixinsight, there aren’t a lot of tools that I’m aware of that perform these things on images in linear form.

Is anyone willing to describe their general workflow for applying additional processing outside of APP?


ReplyQuote
(@brcooley)
Molecular Cloud Customer
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 4
March 16, 2019 21:59  

@mabula-admin or @vincent-mod,  any ideas or suggestions on best practices?


ReplyQuote
 Tim
(@tim)
Main Sequence Star Customer
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 36
March 17, 2019 22:07  

I have Photoshop with astro plugins, StarTools, Pixinsight and APP. My current method is to process in APP then depending on what further processing is required, I choose the best tool. Usually I just go to Photoshop with the stretched data for some final touch-ups. If I feel more post processing is required I'll load the  linear - non stretched - data into Star Tools for whatever is required. Star Tools is only about $50 US and only covers the functions after calibration. Star Tools is the opposite of Pixinsight in that it automates a lot of processes while Pixinsight requires more user decision making. I find StarTools is quicker.  

Its too bad that StarTools and APP didn't work together and provide a complete system as they seem to have some similar philosophies. You can, of course use Pixinsight.  I just find it non intuitive and time consuming compared to other choices. I'm just glad APP came along and will continue adding function. 


ReplyQuote
Share: