Molecular Clouds in...
 
Share:

We have updated the forum software 🙂 ! We are now working on upgrading the whole site and the Forum to a dark theme...  so please refresh your internet browser twice to properly update the forum appearance AND functionality... Check your internet browser for the refresh function, on windows, this usually is the F5 button, but it depends on your internet browser.

Molecular Clouds in Cepheus: MBM 163, 164 & 165 and LBN 569.  

  RSS

(@maurice_toet)
Brown Dwarf Customer
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 6
August 27, 2018 14:43  

Rarely imaged Molecular Clouds in Cepheus: MBM 163, 164 & 165 and LBN 569. MBM is an abbreviation for Magnani, Blitz and Mundy who identified/catalogued 57 molecular clouds at high galactic altitudes in 1985.

https://www.mauricetoet.nl/DeepSky/i-5Z9v6J4/A

Imaged with a Nikon D810a and Takahashi Epsilon-180ED on A-P Mach1 GTO3. Total integration time of 26.5 hours using 5 min. subs @ ISO 400 (318 light frames). Dither-guided with a Lacerta MGEN standalone autoguider (Vixen 70S guidescope). Captured during 6 nights (August 6, 8, 10, 11, 13 and 17) in Izon-la-Bruisse, Drôme, France.

At the beginning of each session, 30 flat frames were captured. Offset correction with a master bias frame of 200 bias frames. I didn't use dark frames.

Processing with APP. Settings other than default:

- noise weighted integration;

- MBB enabled: 5%;

- LNC enabled: 1st degree, 1 iteration.

DDP stretch: 20% BG - 3 sigma - 2.5% base.

Light pollution removal / fixing gradients: marking background areas with several dozen squares.

Post-processing in Adobe Photoshop CC: increasing colour vibrance/saturation (in RGB mode and on a and b channels in Lab colour mode), tightening star edges, enhancing nebulas/midtones (curves with layer mask to protect the stars), very slight noise reduction in the background (using noise reduction in  Camera RAW).

Full field of view in colour:

Contrast enhanced monochrome version (with less stars):

Annotated version:

I 'discovered' this area by browsing / exploring the Aladin Sky Atlas. Last February I tried out a part of this area using the digitized POSS-II data (red and blue plates). Now I can show my result and that of the 48-inch f/2.5 Oschin Schmidt Telescope side-by-side.

 

This topic was modified 7 months ago 2 times by Maurice Toet

1CM69 and Dong Hun liked
ReplyQuote
(@minusman)
Neutron Star Customer
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 108
August 27, 2018 20:15  

😍Wow


ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Quasar Admin
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2056
September 3, 2018 23:26  

Hi Maurice @maurice_toet,

Wow indeed, what a superb image, have rarely seen this 😉 !

Fantastic work to stick to such a long integration time for one object while on holiday ( I assume ? ) in La France.

Did you see clear differences with the integration weights? Any particular reason why yo used noise weighting ?

Thanks a lot for sharing 🙂 

Mabula

Main developer of Astro Pixel Processor and owner of Aries Productions


ReplyQuote
(@maurice_toet)
Brown Dwarf Customer
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 6
September 4, 2018 17:01  

Thanks Mabula,

This was indeed captured during my holiday in France. My goal was to capture at least 25 hours of integration time...

I have to confess I haven't made several integrations with different weight settings to compare. What I could have done (to save calculation time) is to integrate say 30 frames (instead of 318) with different weight settings for comparison. I decided to use noise weighting as I wanted to have the least of noise as possible in the 'background'. 


ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Quasar Admin
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2056
September 25, 2018 21:01  

Hi Maurice @maurice_toet,

"I have to confess I haven't made several integrations with different weight settings to compare. What I could have done (to save calculation time) is to integrate say 30 frames (instead of 318) with different weight settings for comparison. I decided to use noise weighting as I wanted to have the least of noise as possible in the 'background'. "

Yes good argument, I think it should have proven to be a good choice.

Another way to test integration settings, is by integrating only a crop of the reference frame. That should run much quicker as well 😉

Thanks again for sharing this beautiful result...

Mabula

Main developer of Astro Pixel Processor and owner of Aries Productions


ReplyQuote
Share: