Share:
Notifications
Clear all

June 24 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta46 has been released !

Improved internal memory configuration (lower ! memory usage), fixed beta45 startup issue, fixed Set Save Directory & 2-panel mosaics.

May 27 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta45 has been released !

Fully Multi-Threaded LNC, many improvements for the registration engine, platform upgrade, and further tuning of internal memory consumption and memory release back to OS.

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

APP v PI Stacking issue

7 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
1,842 Views
(@joesphotovideogmail-com)
Molecular Cloud
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 3
Topic starter  

Hi,

Relatively new to APP (2.0 Beta 4).  Have been using Pixinsight for some time. Looking to use APP for Mosaic and other processing. 

I ran a test using the same exact data set on the same laptop. I'm not concerned with time but for those that matter APP was much faster. What I did notice though is that the stars did not come out as expected with APP.

Test Rig

Samyang 135mm with ASI533MC-Pro Camera

Integration of 157 Lights @ 120s

30 Darks, 30 Flats, 30 FlatDarks

 

APP on the left (11 minutes to process) PI on the Right (55minutes to process)

Dell Laptop ith I9 and 64gb memory with SSD Drive

Defaults settings on both. Normalization and Cosmetic Correction on both

 

The image on the left (APP) overall looks good. However, when you compare to the PI image on the right you can see the APP Image has almost square stars when zoomed in. In PI the stars are pixelated but still round. 

2022 09 28 135043

 Can someone suggest what changes could be made in APP to address this? I ran it twice with the same exact results. 

 

Thanks!

 


This topic was modified 4 years ago by Joe Santacroce

   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Sorry for the delay Joe,

Could you share the settings you used in APP?



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5358
 

Hi Joe @joesphotovideogmail-com,

Sorry in the delay in our response to your question/issue. I was on holiday myself, but I am back now 😉

The screenshot that you show seems to indicates that you have undersampled data. There are different solutions to get better results in this case.

I assume that you used the normal integration mode and not Drizzle integration, right?

In normal integration, a pixel interpolation/resample filter is used, Lanczos-3 with under and overshoot protection. The settings are in menu 6) Integrate.

Can you try turning off the under- overshoot protection to see if that improves things?

2nd option, is to turn on Drizzle, simple try the following settings first:

set integrate mode to drizzle, keep scale at 1.0, use droplet size 1.0, and the tophat kernel.

I would think that that the drizzle result  would be much better.

If your data is OSC/color data, you can also try bayer drizzle, in that case try:

set integrate mode to bayer/x-trans drizzle, keep scale at 1.0, use droplet size 2.0, and the tophat kernel as a first test.

Please let us know if this improves your result 😉

Mabula

 

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@joesphotovideogmail-com)
Molecular Cloud
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 3
Topic starter  

@mabula-admin 

Hi and thanks for the response. 

I re-ran a few tests and using the Drizzle worked. I purposely did not Drizzle either sample (APP and PI) wanting to stick with defaults as much as possible. I know the ASI533 is undersampled with my 135mm lens but if not blown up it looks ok. With Drizzle on it makes a big difference of course. Particularly when zoomed. 

At least knowing what I need to do is a big help so thanks again. I think that will work going forward. 

 

I am gathering data and will post another (sorry 😉 ) where I was processing a 16 panel Mosaic (307 lights). According to APP I needed 500+ gb free (I had 1tb) and I have 64mb of memory. It ran out of memory somewhere around the beginning of Integration (I didn't save the log and should have noted exactly where so might need to repeat it). Like I said, will put that in a separate post. 

Thanks again

 

 

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@joesphotovideogmail-com)
Molecular Cloud
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 3
Topic starter  

@mabula-admin 

One other question please: I know there was discussion a while back here on the forums about the ability to save settings on exit. At the time it didn't exist but the thought was in a release or two. Just wondering if that is yet available and I just don't see it. Thanks again



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5358
 
Posted by: @joesphotovideogmail-com

@mabula-admin 

One other question please: I know there was discussion a while back here on the forums about the ability to save settings on exit. At the time it didn't exist but the thought was in a release or two. Just wondering if that is yet available and I just don't see it. Thanks again

Dear Joe @joesphotovideogmail-com,

The new 2.0 beta's are already saving/remembering settings between APP restarts. The 2.0 stable version on which we are working will provide save/load settings and projects as we promised. Hope that clarifies it?

Mabula

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5358
 
Posted by: @joesphotovideogmail-com

@mabula-admin 

Hi and thanks for the response. 

I re-ran a few tests and using the Drizzle worked. I purposely did not Drizzle either sample (APP and PI) wanting to stick with defaults as much as possible. I know the ASI533 is undersampled with my 135mm lens but if not blown up it looks ok. With Drizzle on it makes a big difference of course. Particularly when zoomed. 

At least knowing what I need to do is a big help so thanks again. I think that will work going forward. 

 

I am gathering data and will post another (sorry 😉 ) where I was processing a 16 panel Mosaic (307 lights). According to APP I needed 500+ gb free (I had 1tb) and I have 64mb of memory. It ran out of memory somewhere around the beginning of Integration (I didn't save the log and should have noted exactly where so might need to repeat it). Like I said, will put that in a separate post. 

 

Thanks again

 

 

 

Hi Joe @joesphotovideogmail-com,

Great, thank you for you feedback!

Mabula

 



   
ReplyQuote
Share: