UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
I've been playing with APP for under a week, learning from video tutorials etc. After running tab 3. Analyse Stars I checked the chosen reference image and saw it was very poor - massive star trailing compared to all the other frames - so not sure why that was selected as the Ref. Also I tried right clicking and selecting create analytic graph but nothing showed up. Also the sorting by certain columns doesn't appear to work.
This is indeed a bit strange, also as the FWHM values are higher then other frames (which makes sense given the trails). Is this with the latest version of APP? And did you see this with other data sets as well?
Hi Vincent thanks for replying. I tried with a different set and the image with highest quality was chosen as reference so that worked. Â
I did notice another issue in registration on the new dataset where red was slightly displaced so will investigate.
Not sure why the graph doesn't work though.
I think I know why the chosen image counted as reference image. it appears the frame has double star images across whole frame (must have suffered a knock) - so presumably star density metric doubled!
Â
Â
