NGC 7380 (Wizard Ne...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

MAY 4 2026: APP 2.0.0-beta44 has been released !

New improved internal memory controls should now work on all computers

May 1 2026: APP 2.0.0-beta43 has been released !

Improved internal memory controls (much more stable and faster on big datasets), fixed CPU image viewer, fixed Narrowband extraction demosaic algortihms.

Apr 29 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta42 has been released !

New improved Normalization engine, Fixed random crashes in integration, fixed RGB Combine & Calibrate Star Colors, fixed Narrowband extraction algorithms, new development platform with performance gains, bug fixes in the tools, etc...

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

NGC 7380 (Wizard Nebula)

5 Posts
3 Users
2 Reactions
2,433 Views
(@mshieldsdunn)
White Dwarf
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 11
Topic starter  

This represents a few hours of integration time of LRGB+Ha. Processed in APP, Topaz, and PS.

NGC 7380

Thanks for looking,

Matthew



   
artem reacted
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Very nice Matthew! I would maybe add some saturation still.



   
ReplyQuote
(@mshieldsdunn)
White Dwarf
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 11
Topic starter  

@vincent-mod

What about this? I tend to prefer things on the understated side but I do think you are right in this case and that adding more saturation increased some of the detail in the color transitions, for instance. Let me know which version you prefer. 😀 

Wizard APP


   
Michel Sw reacted
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Looks great to me! Very good not to push the processing, that can indeed create artefacts, but in your first image I think you were on a too careful side. 🙂



   
ReplyQuote
(@artem)
Neutron Star
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 93
 

Very nice Image.. 😀 



   
ReplyQuote
Share: