Share:
Notifications
Clear all

15th Feb 2024: Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta29 released - macOS native File Chooser, macOS CMD-Q fixed, read-only Fits on network fixed and other bug fixes

7th December 2023:  added payment option Alipay to purchase Astro Pixel Processor from China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, Korea, Japan and other countries where Alipay is used.

 

[Sticky] Light integration settings with large number of subs

5 Posts
3 Users
3 Likes
6,534 Views
(@dhkim)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 20
Topic starter  

Hi Mabula

Most of tutorials that I found are dealing with small set of subs.

I have 80 subs and I'm wondering what are the good starting point settings for the light integration.

Thank you.

Donghun

 

 


   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 4366
 

Hi Donghun,

Good question 😉 I have made this a sticky

First of all, to get the fastest integration, try to work on the fastest harddrive that you have available.

For a large number of subs, let's say more than 40 light frames, I would advise the following settings in 6) INTEGRATE from top to bottom :

Set the weights on quality, this will give you (in most cases) an integration that is the most optimal for noise and sharpness.

Regarding the integration weights and their effects on integration , check this link:

https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/tutorials-workflows/combining-subs-with-multiple-exposure-time/

Always use "average" integration mode. Only use median with small stacks. Average is superior for a large number of subs.

The composition mode will not have influence on the quality of integration, choose whichever you need, in most cases you want to use "full" to integrate the whole field of view of all your subs combined.

Local Normalization Correction: first make an integration without LNC. Then one with LNC at degree 1 and 1-2 iterations. This will give you an indication if your data needs this. If you have clearly changing gradients in your data, your integration will strongly benefit if you enable LNC. Be aware, LNC can take a long time to complete with a lot of frames. The progress of LNC can be clearly followed in the console panel.

I would suggest to always use MultiBandBlending iwth 5-10% to reduce stack artefacts at the borders of your integration field of view.

For outlier rejection, use sigma or winsorized sigma clipping, only 1 iteration with kappa of 3 to start with. This setting will not be destructive to your SNR and with a large amount of subs will easily remove all outliers.

Don't use linear fit clipping if you use LNC, linear fit clipping is redundant if you apply LNC.

The current implementation of linear fit clipping is really slow (needs improvement), so I wouldn't suggest to use it. Use LNC with sigma or winsorized sigma clipping.

You can enable output maps. These are usefull to get a better grip on what is happening with outlier rejection, MBB and the quality of normalization.

Pixel interpolation: use Lanczos 3 without no under /over shoot with a lot of frames. But if you were to enable it, the difference will be hard to see. It will prevent under and overshoot of the lanczos3 algorithm.

And finally start your integration.

Let me know if all of this is clear 😉 and if the result(s) are pleasing.

Kind regards,

Mabula

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@dhkim)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 20
Topic starter  

Thank you very much Mabula.


   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
(@_spirit_)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 12
 

Hi.

I used 110 frames. All setting like in post by Mabula. No LNC. Also trying 200 frames - it`s OK.


   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 4366
 

Thank you Roman for your feedback 😉


   
ReplyQuote
Share: