Command line calibr...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

15th Feb 2024: Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta29 released - macOS native File Chooser, macOS CMD-Q fixed, read-only Fits on network fixed and other bug fixes

7th December 2023:  added payment option Alipay to purchase Astro Pixel Processor from China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, Korea, Japan and other countries where Alipay is used.

 

Command line calibration for scripting?

5 Posts
4 Users
3 Likes
1,158 Views
(@kingjamez)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 18
Topic starter  

The Voyager sequencing software allows very flexible scripting during an imaging session. It allows arbitrary scripting at almost any point in the imaging process. It would be pretty slick if Voyager could call APP after an image is taken and automatically calibrate it such that only calibrated images are saved.

Of course this would require taking flats at the beginning of an imaging session, but that doesn't seem unreasonable. 

All APP would need is to be able to take in command line instructions like AstroPixelProcessor.exe -C -L "Light.fit" -D "MasterDark.fit" -F "MasterFlat.fit" -B "Bias.fit" -DF "DarkFlat.fit" 

Or something similar. 

Thoughts?


   
ReplyQuote
(@vincent-mod)
Universe Admin
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 5707
 

I think having some form of terminal access would be interesting, not sure how Mabula sees that or how easy  that would be to intergrate @mabula-admin ?


   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 4366
 

Dear @kingjamez,

As you probably know, our company is now an official partner of iTelescope.net. As part of our cooperation, we are working towards the ability of APP to fully automatically calibrate and process up until integration of data captured by any capture software package.

Thus APP will capture the captured data and will start processing it. There really is no need for scripting here. That only complicates matters I think. It will be enough for you to load the proper calibration data into APP, then start imaging and let the capture software save the lights in a folder that APP would monitor.;-)  This is the way we are planning this and the upside is that it will work with any capture package without the need for scripting. On the other hand, if we see clear reason for scripting for some reason, we will not hesitate to make that possible.

APP will even then create the integration for you once capture is completed. So APP in the future will do live stacking/integration of your data from calibration to integration... off course, we are not there yet, it will take time to get there.

Does this sound reasonable?

Kind regards,

Mabula


   
ReplyQuote
(@kingjamez)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 18
Topic starter  

@mabula-admin

That would be an amazing solution... I LOVE IT. Thank you! I can't wait to give it a try.

 

-Jim


   
ReplyQuote
(@ldipenti)
White Dwarf
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 8
 
Posted by: @mabula-admin

Dear @kingjamez,

As you probably know, our company is now an official partner of iTelescope.net. As part of our cooperation, we are working towards the ability of APP to fully automatically calibrate and process up until integration of data captured by any capture software package.

Thus APP will capture the captured data and will start processing it. There really is no need for scripting here. That only complicates matters I think. It will be enough for you to load the proper calibration data into APP, then start imaging and let the capture software save the lights in a folder that APP would monitor.;-)  This is the way we are planning this and the upside is that it will work with any capture package without the need for scripting. On the other hand, if we see clear reason for scripting for some reason, we will not hesitate to make that possible.

APP will even then create the integration for you once capture is completed. So APP in the future will do live stacking/integration of your data from calibration to integration... off course, we are not there yet, it will take time to get there.

Does this sound reasonable?

Kind regards,

Mabula

Hi @mabula-admin,

I think a command line interface would be really useful for multi-session processing and also would allow really big datasets processing by being able to crunch in parallel some parts of the workflow (like: calibration, star analize... all the things that are done on individual subexposures).

I work for a project that maintains a open source platform for processing genomic data (www.arvados.org) and I think having a way to script the different steps of APP processing combined with an elastic compute platform like Arvados would allow APP adoption of astronomers that have enormous datasets. Even with not-so-big datasets, something like this would be great so that we can test different settings, re-running only the necessary steps.

Best regards,
Lucas.


   
Davide Nitti reacted
ReplyQuote
Share: