<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Astro Pixel Processor Forum - Recent Topics				            </title>
            <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/</link>
            <description>Astro Pixel Processor Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 19:10:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>VdB 15</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/gallery/vdb-15/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 21:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;

Remote data from China.
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
10891
<p>Remote data from China.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Paolo Banci</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/gallery/vdb-15/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Static Working Directory</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/rfcs-request-for-changes/static-working-directory/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[It would be great if the working directory didn&#039;t change based on the last files loaded. I (and probably many others) keep their master calibration frames in a different location than the li...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great if the working directory didn't change based on the last files loaded. I (and probably many others) keep their master calibration frames in a different location than the light frames. As it is now, I open APP and set my working directly to where my lights are and load them. Then I load my calibration frames but before I can initiate the process I have to go back and reset my working directory so that the resulting files save to the correct location. Yes I could copy my calibration frames to be in the same place as the lights but that seems like an unnecessary step when the working directory could just be static.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Love APP and the work you're all doing just wanted to get some feedback!</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Reginald Pratt</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/rfcs-request-for-changes/static-working-directory/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Problem with Integration</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/problem-with-integration/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 10:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[I am using version 2.0.0-beta43 (2.0.0-beta43). I had no problem integrating files, yesterday.
Today, I am getting the warning (attached screenshot). I have not changed any of the integrati...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using version 2.0.0-beta43 (2.0.0-beta43). I had no problem integrating files, yesterday.</p>
<p>Today, I am getting the warning (attached screenshot). I have not changed any of the integration settings. What has suddenly gone wrong?</p>
<p>If I click OK, the programme proceeds at a snail pace.</p>
<p>Please help.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
10890
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Allen Lloyd</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/problem-with-integration/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Images that won&#039;t get registered by APP (any version)</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/images-that-wont-get-registered-by-app-any-version/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 15:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[I have problem registering my images when the FOV is very small with a very small number of stars and these are sometimes very big. This kind of subframes are generated by my old Meade 10&quot; S...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have problem registering my images when the FOV is very small with a very small number of stars and these are sometimes very big. This kind of subframes are generated by my old Meade 10" SC scope in combination with a small sensor.<br />I think I tried everything but APP does reject at least the blue channel while registering. Additional to the above conditions there was full moon in the sky, so SNR is bad.<br />Pixinsight also does not register these images, SIRIL the same. Only Setiastrosuite does, but this one does introduce other problems to the image.<br /><br />Is there a chance to implement a mode for such kind of bad images, so that i can actually make use of them?<br /><br />Thank you!<br /><br />I attached one uncalibrated subframe from the blue channel to show what I am talking about.</p>
10886
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Walter Leonhard Schramböck</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/images-that-wont-get-registered-by-app-any-version/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta45 release notes - Work In Progress</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/release-information/astro-pixel-processor-2-0-0-beta45-release-notes-work-in-progress/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta45 release notes

FIXED 4)REGISTER comet/one-star 
As reported herethe comet/one-star regisgtration mode had several issues with data that has little stars...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12pt">Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta45 release notes</span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>FIXED 4)REGISTER comet/one-star </strong>
<p>As reported here <a href="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/comet-registration-and-integration/beta-41-comet-registration-issues/#post-34307" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/comet-registration-and-integration/beta-41-comet-registration-issues/#post-34307</a> the comet/one-star regisgtration mode had several issues with data that has little stars and low quality (shot in the morning glow). We have fixed 4 problems so now the data can be properly processed. We have fixed 2 bugs related to little stars so the images might not be able to register on the stars. We fixed the counter of which image is being processed in the comet mode and we also added a warning message if star registration is simply not possible and the user should try to disable star analysis and the register on the comet only.</p>
</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Mabula-Admin</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/release-information/astro-pixel-processor-2-0-0-beta45-release-notes-work-in-progress/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Enhance AAD to remove more green and provide a balanced RGB output</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/rfcs-request-for-changes/enhance-aad-to-remove-more-green-and-provide-a-balanced-rgb-output/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 19:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[I like using AAD, but its still doesn&#039;t take into account (enough) the 2 G in the standard Bayer matrix, and bring it under control, tried 3 cameras on it and all leave green tinge, this due...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like using AAD, but its still doesn't take into account (enough) the 2 G in the standard Bayer matrix, and bring it under control, tried 3 cameras on it and all leave green tinge, this due to matrix brings in so much green, the debayer algorithm needs to realize there's twice as much green coming into the sensors to normalize this and get it under control with the goal to balance R/ G/ B.   I know when you write the algorithm, you like Green, because its like a luminance channel, but in the final output, suggest you AVERAGE or half the green, like someone get it under control so the final output has better white balance and all R/ G/B match in frames/ intensity like mono.   I don't want to have to heavily fix this in post, and i want to come out right to start with. </p>
<p>Running SuperPixel vs AAD, the former has much blacker background and whiter objects (this proves the issue is with the algorithm), however I want the full resolution.  Maybe we can try AHD or VNG to see how they look, or better yet, a revision on AAD like AAD2.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Skye Goodrich</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/rfcs-request-for-changes/enhance-aad-to-remove-more-green-and-provide-a-balanced-rgb-output/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Encountered error in module CreateQualityRegistrationDescriptorsTask</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/encountered-error-in-module-createqualityregistrationdescriptorstask/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 12:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[I am using beta44 to stack more than 2000 Seestar subframes and encountered this memory issue. What could be the reason?

&nbsp;]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using beta44 to stack more than 2000 Seestar subframes and encountered this memory issue. What could be the reason?</p>
10881
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Manoj Venkata Aditya Vempati</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/encountered-error-in-module-createqualityregistrationdescriptorstask/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>APP 2.0.0 beta43 is slow on normalization</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/macos/app-2-0-0-beta43-is-slow-on-normalization/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello
I am working on MBP M4Pro Max and if star analyser and registration is faster, normalization (non overlap) is very slow compare to past versions. 
I preprocessed something close to 7...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>I am working on MBP M4Pro Max and if star analyser and registration is faster, normalization (non overlap) is very slow compare to past versions. </p>
<p>I preprocessed something close to 700 images R, G, B, S, H, O and normalization took a much longer time than before (maybe something close to 1-2 seconds per image. Before these last versions the time for 700 images was very fast (several seconds for all). Images have 100 Mpix (Moravian C5)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Anyway, there is something I don't understand in the reasonnement :</p>
<p>Why normaization reflect to the reference image ? As if a red image is reference, all S, H, O will be normaliezd along this red one ? </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The real (or optional) procedure should have each stack get normalized with its own reference. Usually I find a green image to be set as reference. There are lot of stars and maybe some gradients or huge signal on it. If I take for example the OIII ones, signal is very low and I don't understant why it is normalized with the green reference. </p>
<p>Please explain if I am wrong</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Philippe</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Philippe BERNHARD</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/macos/app-2-0-0-beta43-is-slow-on-normalization/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta44 release notes</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/release-information/astro-pixel-processor-2-0-0-beta44-release-notes/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta44 release notes

FIXED NEW MEMORY CONTROLS / FASTER AND MORE STABLE ON BIG DATASETS
We have further improved the new internal memory controls. APP should ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12pt">Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta44 release notes</span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>FIXED NEW MEMORY CONTROLS / FASTER AND MORE STABLE ON BIG DATASETS</strong>
<p>We have further improved the new internal memory controls. APP should have lower latency now and should no longer stall/pause/freeze while processing big datasets. This fix should ensure that it works on all computers now.</p>
<p>To make APP run faster and more stable on big datasets, the new memory controls can no longer fragment the internal memory of APP. That caused the slowing down of APP in older versions. Latency of the application has improved as well. When APP starts now, it will report how much memory it can use safely without compromising the stability of the Operating System. It reports the maximum memory and also a soft maximum memory value. While processing, the soft maximum memory should not be crossed unless APP really needs the memory for a very intensive memory task after which it can never cross the maximum memory threshold. After any task, APP should also gradually release the used memory again back to the Operating System. On computers with little RAM memory (less than 16GB of RAM), the soft maximum and maximum will almost be equal or equal. On systems with plenty of RAM (more than 64GB of RAM), the soft maximum will be fixed at 32GB of RAM which should ensure fast and stable processing without consuming too much memory which can slow things down.</p>
</li>
</ul>
10877
<p>This is a <strong>further improvement over the below release note from beta43</strong>, this change and improvement should now work on all computers.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>IMPROVED INTERNAL MEMORY CONTROLS / FASTER AND MORE STABLE ON BIG DATASETS</strong>
<p>As reported here : <a href="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/randomly-stopping-freezing-during-integrations/#post-34236" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/randomly-stopping-freezing-during-integrations/#post-34236 </a> APP could stall/slow down or even freeze when processing big to very big datasets (500+ frames). The lastest APP releases have many code optimizations making it quite a bit faster, but the memory clean up internally was not able to keep up with all the GigaBytes of data that were processed. The old memory controls internally were fragmentating the memory causing these instability issues now and more quickly as well. Luckily, we are able to prevent this fragmentation completely by using a very different memory configuration internally. Technically, we have switched APP from using java's default G1 garbage collector with many G1 tweaks to using the more advanced Z garbage collector. This proves to be much better for data throughput and stability. Processing big datasets should not slow down APP at all anymore after having done several 100s of  frames in integration.</p>
</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Mabula-Admin</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/release-information/astro-pixel-processor-2-0-0-beta44-release-notes/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Please add a Photometric Color Calibration (PCC) feature (like Siril)</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/rfcs-request-for-changes/please-add-a-photometric-color-calibration-pcc-feature-like-siril/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 03:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Please add a Photometric Color Calibration (PCC) feature (like in Siril) to help correct the color balance.]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please add a Photometric Color Calibration (PCC) feature (like in Siril) to help correct the color balance. </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Skye Goodrich</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/rfcs-request-for-changes/please-add-a-photometric-color-calibration-pcc-feature-like-siril/</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		