<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Astro Pixel Processor Forum - Recent Topics				            </title>
            <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/</link>
            <description>Astro Pixel Processor Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>Allow specific values for RGB Multipliers not just Sliders (on 0 Color Settings) and saving Presets</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/rfcs-request-for-changes/allow-specific-values-for-rgb-multipliers-not-just-sliders-on-0-color-settings-and-saving-presets/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 23:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Allow specific values to be entered for RGB Multipliers not just Sliders (on 0 Color Settings), and saving Presets, so I can save a Preset (R/G/B) white balance per Color Camera (not just DS...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow specific values to be entered for RGB Multipliers not just Sliders (on 0 Color Settings), and saving Presets, so I can save a Preset (R/G/B) white balance per Color Camera (not just DSLR).   Many graphics software permit saving of white balance presets for the purpose.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Skye Goodrich</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/rfcs-request-for-changes/allow-specific-values-for-rgb-multipliers-not-just-sliders-on-0-color-settings-and-saving-presets/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>APP won&#039;t remember the Integrate Percentage Slider</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/windows/app-wont-remember-the-integrate-percentage-slider/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 13:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Although most settings are stored between sessions, APP won&#039;t remember the integration percentage &quot;lights to stack&quot; such as if I set it on 90% one session, it forgets and goes back 100%.   S...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although most settings are stored between sessions, APP won't remember the integration percentage "lights to stack" such as if I set it on 90% one session, it forgets and goes back 100%.   Suggest have it remember what I set last time.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Skye Goodrich</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/windows/app-wont-remember-the-integrate-percentage-slider/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>what reasons can it have when integrating sony a7rv subs with astropixelprocessor that the stack show a lot of artefacts when a single sub does not, especially when the light pollution gradient is removed?</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/what-reasons-can-it-have-when-integrating-sony-a7rv-subs-with-astropixelprocessor-that-the-stack-show-a-lot-of-artefacts-when-a-single-sub-does-not-especially-when-the-light-pollution-gradient-is-rem/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 18:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello,
&nbsp;
been using APP with Nikon and ASI Zwo mono for a while, trying out a Sony a7rV
one subs looks like this after lightpollution:

&nbsp;
but doing a normal stack as usual, I...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>been using APP with Nikon and ASI Zwo mono for a while, trying out a Sony a7rV</p>
<p>one subs looks like this after lightpollution:</p>
10750
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>but doing a normal stack as usual, I kepp getting strange pattern when applying LP substraction:</p>
10752
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>any idea why? One subs is 30s, the stack 1 hour total</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>does APP apply LP too strong? Even if so these paatern should not appear. IN the single subs there is nothing</p>
10753]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>elgol</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/what-reasons-can-it-have-when-integrating-sony-a7rv-subs-with-astropixelprocessor-that-the-stack-show-a-lot-of-artefacts-when-a-single-sub-does-not-especially-when-the-light-pollution-gradient-is-rem/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Help - integrated images all blank - Why?</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/help-integrated-images-all-blank-why/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 10:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hi. have been using APP for a long time and never had any trouble until today. Loaded 54 FITS of M64 and used the normal settings I&#039;ve used all along. Master calibrations files all assign th...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. have been using APP for a long time and never had any trouble until today. Loaded 54 FITS of M64 and used the normal settings I've used all along. Master calibrations files all assign themselves etc but when it come to integration there is suddenly nothing. So have tried a trial with other data files I have that have worked before - nothing. APP reports Integration 1 has ISO/gain of 0.000 and the screen is just black.<br />Any ideas will be greatly appreciated as this has me totally baffled. Thanks.</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Charles Thody</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/help-integrated-images-all-blank-why/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>ToupTek 585 Color, one session o.k., the next is green ?</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/touptek-585-color-one-session-o-k-the-next-is-green/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 16:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hi,
I have made two automatic session in one night. The first with NGC3628 worked fine in APP, the next session with M13 (same Darks, Bias etc ...) the picture is only green, also if I clic...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have made two automatic session in one night. The first with NGC3628 worked fine in APP, the next session with M13 (same Darks, Bias etc ...) the picture is only green, also if I click "neutralize bg". The single subs were shown right.</p>
<p>Here a single sub (pattern in Fits-Header is RGGB)</p>
10749
<p>and this is the stacked result:</p>
10748
<p>Interesting is that if I open both fits in f.e. ASI Fits Viewer, both look like the single sub.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Whats wrong here please.</p>
<p>CS<br />Werner</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Werner Stumpferl</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/touptek-585-color-one-session-o-k-the-next-is-green/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Vela Supernova Remnant</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/gallery/vela-supernova-remnant/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 08:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[This is a four panel mosaic of the Vela Supernova Remnant, in HOO (with RGB stars). Not really going for subtle here.
Shot from suburban Canberra, Australia. I&#039;m guessing this target is too...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a four panel mosaic of the Vela Supernova Remnant, in HOO (with RGB stars). Not really going for subtle here.</p>
<p>Shot from suburban Canberra, Australia. I'm guessing this target is too far south for most in the Northern hemisphere.</p>
<p>Please don't look too closely at the stars - I'm having some backfocus and tilt issues.</p>
<p>JC</p>
<p>downsized for posting.</p>
10745]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>John Connor</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/gallery/vela-supernova-remnant/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>All of my color shots using ZWO ASI585MC Pro have a Green cast</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/all-of-my-color-shots-using-zwo-asi585mc-pro-have-a-green-cast/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 16:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Using all default settings, All of my color shots using ZWO ASI585MC Pro have a Green cast.  I don&#039;t think this is because of Bayer RGGB matrix or extra QE sensitivity to Green, as the APP s...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using all default settings, All of my color shots using ZWO ASI585MC Pro have a Green cast.  I don't think this is because of Bayer RGGB matrix or extra QE sensitivity to Green, as the APP software should be demosaicing for this (i.e., it will fill in missing red/blue/green).   </p>
<p>Comparatively, my ASI585MM Pro shots with filters look wonderful, color is very balanced. </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Skye Goodrich</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/all-of-my-color-shots-using-zwo-asi585mc-pro-have-a-green-cast/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>APP 2.0.0 Beta 39 Cannot Save Calibrated Light Frames With Align Channels Selected</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/windows/app-2-0-0-beta-39-cannot-save-calibrated-light-frames-with-align-channels-selected/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 14:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[APP 2.0.0 Beta 39 Cannot Save Calibrated Light Frames With Align Channels Selected
APP stops processing after 3 files processed. If I deselect Align Channels files will process.
10:13:16 -...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APP 2.0.0 Beta 39 Cannot Save Calibrated Light Frames With Align Channels Selected</p>
<p>APP stops processing after 3 files processed. If I deselect Align Channels files will process.</p>
<p>10:13:16 - GENERAL IMAGE LOADER: loading frame D:\HAL2024 Astro\Work\lights\2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits<br />10:13:16 - 2) CALIBRATE: Adaptive Data Pedestal: disabled<br />10:13:16 - 2) CALIBRATE: performing calibration in 32bits normalized floats...<br />10:13:16 - 2) CALIBRATE: converting data to 32bits normalized floats...<br />10:13:16 - FITS FRAME SAVER: D:\HAL2024 Astro\Work\APP\2026-03-10-0157_6-M82_533_60s_101g_-10d_d_00003-cal.fits : finished successfully<br />10:13:16 - GENERAL FRAME SAVER: null : finished successfully<br />10:13:16 - 2) CALIBRATE: starting Cosmetic Correction...<br />10:13:16 - 2) CALIBRATE: Cosmetic Correction: hot pixel correction enabled with kappa 3.0<br />10:13:16 - 2) CALIBRATE: Cosmetic Correction: cold column correction enabled with kappa 8.0<br />10:13:16 - 2) CALIBRATE: Cosmetic Correction: hot column correction enabled with kappa 8.0<br />10:13:16 - 2) CALIBRATE: Cosmetic Bad Column Correction: CFA data<br />10:13:16 - 2) CALIBRATE: Cosmetic Correction: number of cosmetically corrected hot columns: 0<br />10:13:16 - 2) CALIBRATE: Cosmetic Correction: number of cosmetically corrected cold columns: 0<br />10:13:16 - 2) CALIBRATE: Cosmetic Correction: number of cosmetically corrected bad columns: 0<br />10:13:16 - 2) CALIBRATE: Cosmetic Hot Pixel Correction:: Bayer CFA data<br />10:13:17 - 2) CALIBRATE: Cosmetic Hot Pixel Correction: creating cosmetic Hot Pixel Map...<br />10:13:17 - 2) CALIBRATE: Cosmetic Hot Pixel Correction: number of cosmetically corrected hot pixels: 13958<br />10:13:17 - 2) CALIBRATE: Cosmetic Correction: finished...<br />10:13:17 - Channel Aligner: starting for frame 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits<br />10:13:17 - Channel Aligner: performing star analysis on frame 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: starting...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: color data<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: getting channel 1<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: creating star map...<br />10:13:17 - GENERAL IMAGE LOADER: frame D:\HAL2024 Astro\Work\lights\2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits was loaded successfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates: initial FWHM estimate: 7.20 +- 1.80 pixels<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates: target noise level is at kappa 1.0<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates: target luminosity of stars is 1.622E-03<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates: initially identified 27 of possible star candidates<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: star map created successfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identified star candidates successfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probing star positions and luminosities...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probing local background, noise and FWHM for all stars...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: estimated Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of star profiles : 7.20 +- 1.80 pixels...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: analysing all stars candidates with star size areas equal to or larger than 20 pixels... <br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: performed &amp; collecting 2D general gaussian star profile regression and IW centroiding on all stars successfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: removed 5 star candidates stars from the initial star candidates<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: 22 star candidates left<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: removed stars that are too close to each other successffully: 0 stars removed<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: correcting star map and star list for possible bad star detections...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: number of removed duplicate stars 1<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: final number of identified and fully analysed stars 21<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: receiving final details...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: closed<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: starting...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: color data<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: getting channel 2<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: creating star map...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probed star positions and luminosities successfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probed local background, noise and FWHM for all stars successfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: got all star details succesfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probed local background, noise and FWHM for all stars successfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: star map created successfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates: initial FWHM estimate: 10.44 +- 2.61 pixels<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates: target noise level is at kappa 1.0<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates: target luminosity of stars is 3.185E-04<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates: initially identified 96 of possible star candidates<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probing star positions and luminosities...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probing local background, noise and FWHM for all stars...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identified star candidates successfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: estimated Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of star profiles : 10.44 +- 2.61 pixels...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: analysing all stars candidates with star size areas equal to or larger than 20 pixels... <br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probed star positions and luminosities successfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: performed &amp; collecting 2D general gaussian star profile regression and IW centroiding on all stars successfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: removed 11 star candidates stars from the initial star candidates<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: 76 star candidates left<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: removed stars that are too close to each other successffully: 0 stars removed<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: correcting star map and star list for possible bad star detections...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: number of removed duplicate stars 2<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: final number of identified and fully analysed stars 74<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: receiving final details...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: closed<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: starting...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: color data<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: getting channel 3<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: creating star map...<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probed local background, noise and FWHM for all stars successfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: got all star details succesfully<br />10:13:17 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probed local background, noise and FWHM for all stars successfully<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates...<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: star map created successfully<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates: initial FWHM estimate: 10.51 +- 2.63 pixels<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates: target noise level is at kappa 1.0<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates: target luminosity of stars is 3.473E-04<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identifying star candidates: initially identified 83 of possible star candidates<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probing star positions and luminosities...<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probing local background, noise and FWHM for all stars...<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: estimated Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of star profiles : 10.51 +- 2.63 pixels...<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: analysing all stars candidates with star size areas equal to or larger than 20 pixels... <br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: identified star candidates successfully<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probed star positions and luminosities successfully<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probed local background, noise and FWHM for all stars successfully<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: performed &amp; collecting 2D general gaussian star profile regression and IW centroiding on all stars successfully<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: removed 5 star candidates stars from the initial star candidates<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: 67 star candidates left<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: removed stars that are too close to each other successffully: 0 stars removed<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: correcting star map and star list for possible bad star detections...<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: number of removed duplicate stars 1<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: final number of identified and fully analysed stars 66<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: receiving final details...<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: closed<br />10:13:18 - Channel Aligner: received star analysis results for frame 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits<br />10:13:18 - Channel Aligner: starting registration for Red and Blue channels with Green Channel for frame 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits<br />10:13:18 - Channel Aligner: received pattern recognition descriptors for Green Channel for frame 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits<br />10:13:18 - <br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: triangles descriptors: start expansion of registration hypothesis for frames 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits-Red-channel with reference -Green-channel with 18 star pairs<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: got all star details succesfully<br />10:13:18 - 3) ANALYSE STARS: 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits: probed local background, noise and FWHM for all stars successfully<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: testing registration hypothesis for frames 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits-Red-channel and reference -Green-channel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: no DDC performing RANSAC # 18 pairs<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: no DDC after RANSAC # 18 pairs with RMS 1.09<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: Is homography nearly identity matrix: true<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: DCC disabled at startup: true<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: choosing noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: initial RMS 1.094 on 18 star pairs<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: number of pairs after RANSAC: 00019 - RMS 1.07 - noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: number of pairs after RANSAC: 00019 - RMS 1.07 - noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: limiting hypothesis using no DDC<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: number of pairs after RANSAC: 00005 - RMS 0.18 - noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: number of pairs after RANSAC: 00006 - RMS 0.28 - noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: number of pairs after RANSAC: 00007 - RMS 0.40 - noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: number of pairs after RANSAC: 00008 - RMS 0.42 - noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: number of pairs after RANSAC: 00009 - RMS 0.44 - noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: number of pairs after RANSAC: 00010 - RMS 0.64 - noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: number of pairs after RANSAC: 00011 - RMS 0.88 - noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: number of pairs after RANSAC: 00012 - RMS 0.99 - noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: number of pairs after RANSAC: 00013 - RMS 1.11 - noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: number of pairs after RANSAC: 00013 - RMS 1.11 - noUndistortionModel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: RANSAC: frames 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits-Red-channel and reference -Green-channel finished - number of pairs 13 RMS 1.11<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: triangles descriptors: finished expansion of registration hypothesis for frames 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits-Red-channel with reference -Green-channel<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: triangles descriptors: number of accepted star pairs for frames 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits-Red-channel with reference -Green-channel = 18<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: triangles descriptors: found at descriptor scale 1<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: triangles descriptors: hypothesis gives number of starPairs: 13<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: triangles descriptors: stopping at scale 1<br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: triangles descriptors: number of final star pairs for frames 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits-Red-channel with reference -Green-channel = 13<br />10:13:18 - <br />10:13:18 - Channel Aligner: received registration results for Red Channel for frame 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits<br />10:13:18 - <br />10:13:18 - 4) REGISTER: triangles descriptors: start expansion of registration hypothesis for frames 2026-03-10-0158_6-M82 533 60s 101g -10d d_00004.fits-Blue-channel with reference -Green-channel with 30 star pairs</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Vincent Laine</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/windows/app-2-0-0-beta-39-cannot-save-calibrated-light-frames-with-align-channels-selected/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>running out of disk space</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/rfcs-request-for-changes/running-out-of-disk-space/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 19:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[How do I address this problem when I get messages that I am running out of space ?   Can I add more space? If so, how?
&nbsp;
I have 2 TB of space in my cloud drive...can I access that?  w...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I address this problem when I get messages that I am running out of space ?   Can I add more space? If so, how?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I have 2 TB of space in my cloud drive...can I access that?  what can ido to solve this problem?</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Terry Snapp</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/rfcs-request-for-changes/running-out-of-disk-space/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Can you Help me?</title>
                        <link>https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/can-you-help-me/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 13:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[I am trying to process images in APP and can&#039;t get it to work with my SCT.  I have used APP in the past with my refractor images and everything seems to go smoothly.  For the last few nights...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to process images in APP and can't get it to work with my SCT.  I have used APP in the past with my refractor images and everything seems to go smoothly.  For the last few nights, I have been taking photos with a 9.25 Celestron SCT and I keep getting very fuzzy stacked output.  The individual frames look OK, but when I stack them I get a very fuzzy looking image.  I'm sure I am doing something wrong, but I can't figure out what it is.  I've tried shortening exposure times and playing around with APP settings, but I still have the same problem.  The guiding seems decent.  I've run out of ideas.  Can you help me?  I've attached an individual sub and a typical stacked result. Thank you!</p>
10743
10744]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Michael Hergert</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/main-forum/can-you-help-me/</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		