Question on renewal...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

15th Feb 2024: Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta29 released - macOS native File Chooser, macOS CMD-Q fixed, read-only Fits on network fixed and other bug fixes

7th December 2023:  added payment option Alipay to purchase Astro Pixel Processor from China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, Korea, Japan and other countries where Alipay is used.

 

[Solved] Question on renewal licence

34 Posts
12 Users
10 Likes
26.6 K Views
(@antimorris)
Hydrogen Atom
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 1
 

I am glad to see you are open to changing the pricing model based on the feedback given. I agree with the comments given that the current model is off-putting (as it was to me) since within a couple years the snowballing price just to even open the software goes well beyond other programs like PI or SGP (although that is for capture, but still related). I have a slew of programs for the calibration and integration ranging in prices, and while I am always looking to make my images better and find a better process for that, the inability to even open the program after the expiration date does not seem like a good plan.

A one-time purchase at a similar or slightly higher amount as currently offered that allows full access to the program indefinitely but after the 1-yr period is not eligible for upgrades without an upgrade fee seems like a better way to go. However, if you do want to do a subscription (although Adobe made this a thing, I think it is still not necessarily a well-regarded option by the consumers) then the initial cost should be the same as the renewal cost. This gives a much longer period for new users to spend time with the program before the price alone makes them go to another program and, by then, they will hopefully see it as an invaluable, well-tested, tool so that they are willing to continue subscribing.

Just my 2 cents, but as you said you wanted to hear from more astrophotographers before going to a new model I wanted to share it. 

Thanks!
-Annie

www.eprisephoto.com


   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 4366
 

Hi Annie,

Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts and concerns, it's highly appreciated 😉

I'll make the changes public within several days now... (more or less like you and others have proposed...).

Kind regards,

Mabula


   
Annie reacted
ReplyQuote
(@ccd1024)
Molecular Cloud
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 2
 

Hi Mabula

Annual fee is not a good idea for astronomy processing software. I own several ones (not free, like PixInsight, Startools... ) and I will try your software. If 150€ fee is acceptable, I would say it should be valid for major version (from 1.0 to 1.x )

Than, if you release v2.0, so it is normal you can propose a upgrade price, like 50€ for example. 

But 150€ then need to pay 50€ every year to use the software is not very nice. More if the software is blocked if licence is not renewed.

In this case, I'm not sure I will purchase your software, even if it has very nice features. 

Please think about a fair solution.

Best regards

Philippe


   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 4366
 

Hi Phillipe,

Thank you for sharing your opinion about this.

I will definitely chance the license model and I will make this public soon..

Kind regards,

Mabula


   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2
Share: